Sponsored by
Invest Alongside a Manager with a 40-Year Track Record
Private real estate has long been a cornerstone of institutional portfolios, but individual investors have often had limited access to the asset class - or have had to invest through pooled funds and intermediaries.
Lightstone DIRECT offers a different approach. Accredited investors can invest directly in select real estate opportunities alongside Lightstone, a vertically integrated owner/operator with more than four decades of experience and a $12 billion real estate portfolio.
We invest 20% or more of the equity in every offering, aligning our interests with yours from day one. Our in-house team oversees acquisitions, asset management, and investment execution, with property operations managed by Lightstone and, where appropriate, experienced third-party operators.
No blind funds. No intermediaries. Just direct partnership.
This communication is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Any such offer or solicitation will be made exclusively through the definitive offering documents. All investments involve risk of loss, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Any targeted returns or projections are forward-looking statements, are based on current assumptions, and are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially.
Beginners in Stock Trading
Issue №55 · ~7 min read
Weekend Recap: Week 8 (M2 W4)
The eighth Saturday of the year. With today's recap, the N, New highs / products / management, is fully covered. Three of seven CAN SLIM letters are now in your toolkit. Monday consolidates C + A + N as the integrated triple filter.
A NOTE ON WHERE WE ARE
Real talk on delivery: Monday through Friday this week never went out as evening sends, the same gap that hit the A three weeks ago. You're getting the full N here, all at once, instead of spread across five nights. The C reached you on schedule (Days 31-40). The A got repaired in last Saturday's recap. The N below is the third letter, delivered in full for the first time today.
Practical milestone: as of today you have a workable C + A + N triple filter. A stock that clears all three sits in the top fraction of one percent of the U.S. equity universe by combined fundamental and technical-context quality. The remaining four letters add the supply-side, leadership, sponsorship, and market-timing layers, but the three you already have are enough to build a real watchlist if you start practicing today instead of waiting for S, L, I, M.
THE WEEK IN ONE PARAGRAPH
None of this reached you Monday through Friday. Here's the N in full, day by day:
Monday, the counterintuitive letter. The instinct is to buy stocks that have fallen, hoping for a bounce. The evidence says the opposite: stocks making new 52-week highs go on to outperform stocks making new lows over the following 6-12 months, by a wide margin. O'Neil's tabulation of the great winning stocks found essentially all of them were already making new highs when their big runs began; academic momentum research (Jegadeesh-Titman, 1993) documented the same effect independently, and it has replicated for thirty-plus years since. Three mechanisms explain why: a new-high stock has no trapped buyers waiting to sell at breakeven (no overhead supply), it qualifies for institutional mandates that new-low stocks don't (fresh demand), and it tends to sit inside a positive news narrative that reinforces the buying. The takeaway: buy strength, not weakness.
Tuesday, Trader Tuesday: Pradeep Bonde, our first feature for him. Known as Stockbee, Bonde has run a public, documented trading record and paid education service for more than 24 years, predating the 2020 retail-trading boom by two decades; his mentee Kristjan Kullamägi built a $100M+ track record extending Bonde's own framework. Bonde's contribution, Episodic Pivots, reframes the N: a new high alone is a population-level statistic, not a per-stock entry signal. What separates a high-probability new high from one about to stall is the catalyst behind it. He groups catalysts into four buckets, an earnings beat, a new product, new management, or a regulatory or structural event, and each tends to produce a differently-shaped move. His workflow (check the breakout date, look for an earnings report within five days of it, scan the news for a product or management story, check whether the whole sector is moving) takes about ten minutes and is the version of the N most CAN SLIM traders actually run.
Wednesday, new management: the slowest catalyst, and often the largest. A new CEO doesn't move the business overnight. The strategy takes 6-18 months to design and communicate, the earnings impact takes 18-36 months to show up, and the market's re-rating unfolds across that whole window, which is why the historical winners in this category have produced 200%, 500%, even 1000% advances over two to four years. Three signals in the first 6-12 months tell you whether it's real: strategic clarity in the first 90 days (a specific 3-4 priority list beats vague talk of "shareholder value"), visible operational moves by month six (divestitures, layoffs, new hires, buyback or dividend changes, all checkable in 8-K filings), and a margin inflection in the first earnings report roughly 6-9 months in, even before revenue turns. All three positive means the thesis holds; any one weak means the position should be smaller or skipped.
Thursday, new products: the iPhone-moment pattern. Most launches don't move stocks because they're incremental improvements the market has already priced in. The rare ones that do are discontinuous: they open a market that didn't exist (the iPhone in 2007, AWS in 2006) or displace an existing one outright (Tesla's Model S in 2012, Nvidia's data-center GPU platform through 2022-23). Three features separate the rare mover from the routine launch: the product has to genuinely open or transform a market rather than just improve on the old one, the company has to have the operational muscle to actually scale production and distribution, and the early adoption numbers in the first 6-12 months (unit sales, margins, customer satisfaction) have to confirm the trajectory. These moments show up roughly 5-10 times a decade market-wide, and they're usually only obvious in hindsight.
Friday, the new-high paradox in case studies. A stock that's fallen 40-70% and looks cheap is often a value trap: the low valuation reflects a business that's genuinely still deteriorating, whether it's a company losing share to disruptors, a commodity producer riding a still-falling cycle, or a levered business squeezed by higher rates. A stock at a new high that looks expensive is often the opposite: the great compounders (Apple 2009-2012, Amazon since 2009, Costco, Nvidia since 2016) traded "expensive" through most of their multi-year runs, because the price was tracking earnings that kept growing into the multiple. Four checks tell the two apart: is the fundamental trajectory stabilizing or still declining, is the broader market supportive or hostile, has the chart actually confirmed a bottom, and is the valuation cheap or expensive relative to that trajectory, not in isolation.
THE ONE THING THAT MATTERS MOST FROM M2 W4
If you remember nothing else from this week: trajectory is the right frame, not valuation.
Almost every introductory investing book trains you to ask a valuation question: P/E, price-to-book, price-to-sales, discounted cash flow. The implicit idea is that a stock has a "fair value," and you profit by buying below it and selling above it. That works for deep-value investing in stable, mature businesses. For growth-stock trading, the methodology this newsletter teaches, it's the wrong question.
The right question is whether the stock's underlying business trajectory is improving, stable, or declining, and whether the market is currently pricing that trajectory accurately, conservatively, or optimistically. A stock with an improving trajectory the market is pricing conservatively is positioned to advance, even if the headline valuation looks expensive. A stock with a declining trajectory the market is pricing optimistically is positioned to decline, even if the headline valuation looks cheap.
The C, A, and N together sort for trajectory: the C confirms recent strength, the A confirms multi-year strength, and the N confirms that the trajectory has produced visible new highs and, with the catalyst layer, explains why. Once trajectory becomes the frame, "buy low" is obviously wrong (low usually means declining trajectory) and "buy strength" is obviously right (new highs usually mean improving trajectory).
Next Week
Monday opens M2 W5, C + A + N together as the triple filter: how to apply all three letters simultaneously instead of as separate checks. The combined screen typically narrows the U.S. equity universe to 10-30 high-quality candidates a quarter, the foundation for the chart-pattern timing Months 4-9 build on.
Tuesday is Trader Tuesday: Lance Breitstein, his first broadcast feature. Tier 1 trader: Trillium's all-time top trader, $100M+ verified profits, featured in the upcoming Schwager Market Wizards: The Next Generation.
The rest of the week covers the partial-pass case (what to do when only 2 of 3 letters fit) and a Month 2 review consolidating C, A, and N.
Never worry about roaming again
Stay connected on every trip with Saily eSIM plans. From beach vacations to business travel, access data in 200+ destinations.
VIP perks available.
Activate instantly upon arrival.
Download SAILY in your app store and use code newsletter15 at checkout to get an exclusive 15% off your first purchase.
Chat support available 24/7. Get a full refund if your device isn’t eSIM compatible.
ONE QUESTION THIS WEEK RAISES + ONE WEEKEND HABIT
A question this week's content raises immediately:
Q: "If I have to choose between a stock with a strong catalyst at a new high vs. a stock with a clean fundamental story at a 40% pullback, which is the better trade?"
The new-high stock with the catalyst, almost always, assuming it also passes the C + A + N criteria. The -40% stock looks cheaper, but it's fighting a downtrend with no defined risk anchor, possibly no support from its sector, and no chart confirmation that a bottom has formed. It might recover; it might also fall another 30%. The new-high stock with the catalyst is the methodology's canonical setup, and the risk-reward asymmetry favors it in essentially all cases.
The weekend habit:
Build your first integrated C + A + N watchlist. Take 5-10 stocks you've been considering. For each, check most recent quarter EPS growth (C), three-year compound annual EPS growth plus ROE (A), and new 52-week highs with an identifiable catalyst (N). Mark each Pass, Partial, or Fail. The Pass stocks are your first real watchlist.
TOMORROW, PATTERN OF THE WEEK #8
Tomorrow is Pattern of the Week #8, the VCP, Volatility Contraction Pattern, Mark Minervini's signature setup and its first appearance of the year. Tomorrow introduces its anatomy: the progressive contractions (each pullback smaller than the last), the volume signature, the breakout dynamics, and why the contraction structure is the visible footprint of supply being absorbed in stages. The full Minervini championship deep-dive lands in M8 W2.
Reply with one thing
From your integrated C + A + N watchlist above (or any 3-5 stocks you've been tracking), reply with the ticker that scored highest on the combined three-letter check. Optional bonus: which of the three letters was hardest to verify? We'll feature real replies in next Saturday's recap.
— Beginners in Stock Trading
Educational content only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not predict future results.
Read the full financial disclosure.