In partnership with
There's More Art in a Swiss Warehouse Than in the Louvre. Here's Why That Matters.
1.2 million works worth around $100 billion. All locked away by collectors with no intention of exhibiting them. More art sits in the Geneva Freeport than in the Louvre.
The reason? It's the world's largest tax-free vault. Works are traded inside without ever crossing a border or appearing in any public record.
When that much inventory is effectively off the table, anytime something does circulate, it’s a rare occasion.
Just a three hour drive away, the world’s premier international art fair is one of those occasions. Art Basel is this month and needless to say, things will move fast. Serious collectors will make their transactions before doors even open to the wider public.
Masterworks' acquisition committee — former specialists from Sotheby's and Christie's — operate in that window. Purchased artworks here can even become the offerings that Masterworks members fractionally invest in.
Their track record to-date?
$1.3B deployed across 530+ artworks featuring Banksy, Basquiat, Picasso, and Warhol
29 sales to date
Net annualized returns like 16.5%, 17.6%, and 17.8%, not including those unsold*
Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. See important Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd.
Beginners in Stock Trading
What moves a stock's price
- The three forces that actually move a stock's price, in priority order
- Why "the news" moves prices less than most beginners think
- How to read a price move and infer which force was responsible
- The one volume signal that reveals when institutions are accumulating
This is Day 4. By the end of today, you should be able to look at a stock that moved 5% on a given day and ask better questions about why than most people watching financial television.
THE THREE FORCES
Every price change in a publicly-traded stock is the result of orders being matched on an exchange. Buyers raise their bids; sellers lower their offers; the price meets where matching happens. That is the mechanical reality.
But the reason prices move comes from three sources, and they don't have equal weight. In rough priority order:
1. Earnings power and the trajectory of the business. What the company is actually earning, what it is expected to earn, and how confident the market is in those expectations. This is the dominant long-run force. A company that grows its earnings 25% a year for a decade will see its stock price grow roughly in line with that — sometimes more, sometimes less, but in that direction. A company whose earnings stagnate for a decade will see its stock price stagnate, regardless of how exciting the story sounds.
2. Supply and demand for the shares. How many shares are available to be bought versus how many are being demanded. Even a great business can see its stock fall if a major institutional holder is liquidating a position; even a mediocre business can see its stock rise if a small float collides with concentrated buying interest. We'll spend a full week on this in Month 3 (it's the "S" in CAN SLIM). For now: the supply-demand layer can move a stock 50% in either direction over weeks or months, even when nothing about the underlying business has changed.
3. Sentiment and news. The market's mood. The headline of the morning. The tweet from a CEO. This is the force that drives most of the price movement you'll notice on a given day, and it's the force the financial media talks about almost exclusively. It's also the least useful force to focus on as a trader, because it's the most random and the hardest to predict.
The priority order matters. A trader who builds positions based on force 1 (earnings trajectory) and uses force 2 (supply/demand) for entry timing will, over a long enough horizon, do significantly better than a trader who builds positions based on force 3 (sentiment/news).
"The market does not reward those who are right about the news. It rewards those who are right about the business and the supply."
William O'Neil, paraphrased from How to Make Money in Stocks
WHY NEWS MOVES PRICES LESS THAN YOU THINK
Pay close attention to the next earnings season. Here's what you'll see, repeatedly:
Company X reports earnings that beat analyst expectations. The stock falls 8% in after-hours trading.
Company Y reports earnings that miss analyst expectations. The stock rises 4%.
This happens constantly. It looks irrational. It's not.
The market trades on expectations versus reality, and expectations are continuously embedded in the stock price before the news comes out. By the time Company X reports its beat, the stock price already reflected an even bigger beat that didn't materialize. The stock falls because reality was below the (already high) embedded expectation. Company Y's miss was less severe than the (already low) embedded expectation, so the stock rises.
This is why "trading the news" is so hard. The news is information; the relevant input is the gap between the news and what was already priced in. That gap is invisible to anyone who isn't watching the order flow, the analyst estimate distribution, and the implied volatility curves.
For a beginner, the practical implication is simpler: don't chase headlines. The headline is what the market already knew about by the time you read it. The trade is in what the market doesn't know yet — and that comes from the slower, less obvious work of analyzing earnings trajectories and reading the supply/demand layer of the chart.
READING A PRICE MOVE
When a stock moves 5% on a given day, you can usually infer which force was responsible by looking at three things:
Volume: How does today's volume compare to the stock's average volume over the last 50 days? If volume is 2× to 3× the average, that's institutional activity — supply/demand layer. If volume is roughly normal, the move is sentiment-driven and likely temporary.
Catalyst: Was there a specific news event today (earnings, FDA approval, mergers, macro data)? If yes, force 3 (news/sentiment) is involved. If no — and yet the stock still moved 5% — that's almost certainly the supply/demand layer (force 2), and worth investigating.
Follow-through: Did the move continue the next day, or did it reverse? Genuine institutional buying tends to follow through; sentiment-driven moves often reverse within 1–3 trading days.
If a stock moves 5% on 2× volume, with no news catalyst, and the move continues the next day — institutions are doing something. That is one of the highest-quality signals you can read off a chart. We'll cover the formal name for this (an "accumulation day") when we get to the "I" in CAN SLIM in Month 3.
THE ONE VOLUME SIGNAL
Here's the one thing to take away if nothing else from today: volume is not optional information. Most beginner traders look at price and ignore volume. This is a mistake.
Price tells you what happened. Volume tells you who did it.
A stock can rise 3% on weak volume (50% of its 50-day average) — that's individual retail buying, easily reversed. A stock can rise 3% on heavy volume (200% of its 50-day average) — that's institutional buying, much harder to reverse.
Same price move. Two completely different signals.
Every charting tool you'll use — TradingView, Charts.com, MarketSurge, your broker's software — shows volume as bars at the bottom of the chart. The bars are not decoration. They are how you read intent.
"Read the tape, not the news."
Jesse Livermore, via Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (Edwin Lefèvre, 1923)
Stocks extended their bounce to close out the quarter: a broad, tech-led advance pushed the Nasdaq up 1.5% and carried the Dow to another record high.
| S&P 500 | 7,499.36 (+0.79%) |
| Nasdaq | 26,213.72 (+1.52%) |
| Dow | 52,319.20 (+0.26%) |
Tuesday's close — the last trading day of the quarter, with the Dow at a record.
What drove it: Monday's rebound carried through — the Nasdaq bounced cleanly off its 50-day moving-average line, and per Investor's Business Daily, growth leaders pushed back into buy ranges (GE Vernova, IBD's Stock of the Day, jumped 6% past a buy point). It capped one of the S&P 500's strongest quarters in years. The week's real test is still Thursday's June jobs report.
Today's lesson made a counterintuitive claim: a stock moves on the difference between the news and what the market already expected — not the headline itself. A few hours ago, Nike handed us a live example.
Nike Inc · NKE · $41.05 regular close (−1.0%), about −4% after-hours · Footwear & apparel
After Tuesday's close, Nike reported quarterly results that beat Wall Street on both revenue and profit. Good news, on its face. Yet the stock fell more than 4% in after-hours trading. The reason is exactly what today's lesson described: the beat was already expected and baked into the price. What was not baked in was Nike's soft guidance for the year ahead, which pointed to little growth. The market trades on expectations versus reality — and the outlook came in under the bar, so the stock dropped despite the “good” headline.
- Regular close: $41.05, down about 1% on the day (before the report)
- After-hours: down more than 4% once earnings hit
- The beat: revenue and earnings both topped analyst forecasts
- The catch: full-year guidance pointed to little growth ahead
- Market cap: about $61 billion
- Sector: Footwear & apparel
This is today's lesson in real time, and the habit it should build: when a stock lurches on earnings, don't ask “were the numbers good?” Ask “were they better than what the market already expected?” The headline is what everyone already knew. The move lives in the difference — and tonight, that difference was Nike's outlook, not its quarter.
Tomorrow we cover the structural distinction we've been hinting at: public vs private companies. Why most of the world's economic activity happens in private companies you can't invest in directly, why the public market is the "tip of the iceberg" — and how that fact changes how you should think about the stocks you can buy.
Slack replies in seconds. Not minutes.
Dictate into Slack, email, LinkedIn, or any app and get polished, send-ready text. Wispr Flow strips filler and formats everything. 89% of messages sent with zero edits. Works on Mac, Windows, and iPhone.
Signed World Cup Jerseys. One Given Away Daily. Free.
Kalshi is giving away a signed, authenticated jersey from a World Cup legend every day through July 7. Ochoa, Modrić, Falcao, Varane, and more. Grand prize: Messi's game-worn 800th-goal jersey. Enter free in the Kalshi app and check in daily to stack your entries.
Free to enter. App required. No purchase necessary. 18+, U.S. only (excl. NY & FL).